Skip to main content

Kim who?

                                    
By The Urban Blabbermouth
~
My blog post, Keeping Up with the Kardashians, has sparked a question in my mind: Kim Kardashian has no known talent nor is she an undiscovered genius, so why is she so popular and why are so many people interested in her?  The answer is different reasons for men and for women.

For men, Kim is a woman so it is about sex.  Men do not see a person but a sex object.  Nothing new here.  Kim plays to this.  She is pretty, curvaceous, and flaunts it.  She comes across as the girl of your sex dream, approachable, sexually non-threatening, but out of your league.  In short, she is seen by many men as a walking p****y.

For women, well I do not know what women see.  Here I have to speculate and give you a man's view.  I suspect that Kim represents a liberated woman of some kind.  Kim flaunts rules that other women find binding them in place.  Kim bends society's rules about what a woman's behaviors are supposed to be in a way that benefits herself.  So for women, she is a liberating role model.  Let's face it, whatever men chose to do, they have the power to make it the right thing to do.  Women lack this but Kim has some of this power and perhaps that is why women follow her.  That she uses her body to acquire this power it is not so important to women just that she can and does have it.  Women may not like her behavior but they admire that she can bend rules of womanly behavior and still be accepted in our society.

Stumbled across a site that asks readers for a comparison of Kim Kardashian to Lena Dunham called Cultureby.  You can read the results for yourself.  My simple thought is that it is a comparison of the party girl to the intellectual nerd.  Isn't that the same comparison that we made of our Presidents, George W. Bush, the frat boy, to Barack Obama, the policy wonk?  CultureBy also asked a very interesting question, Who is really Kim Kardashian, and how is she in reality versus her created public image?  I do not think that there will be a true answer to the question unless Kim or one of her friends respond.

Kim has not created anything new.  She is only the latest in a line of women who have used this approach.  I still remember Marilyn Monroe.  Kim may be the next Marilyn, to be remembered for the next fifty years.

Comments

Vol-E said…
Since you ask what women think of Kardashians and their ilk, I can offer you my POV.
There's a lot of schadenfreude in the mix. Women will often look at someone like Kim and think "Yeah, she's got all that money, but one day she's gonna get what's coming to her, just like Anna Nicole Smith did!!" I think the mentality is that people with that kind of money and fame don't have any self-control, and that will lead to their doom via drug overdoses or homicide.

It is interesting that some years after "they get what's coming to them," many of the same people who consciously or subconsciously wished them ill will come to look upon them with pity. People hated Anna Nicole when she had her own TV show ("Sugarpie, shut the f***up!!!") but after she had the baby and then suddenly died, it was "She was so pathetic, how could anyone have hated her?" There's something about a person (and not just a woman, more about that in a second) who seems exempt from the usual rules and consequences, that sets us up to expect a bad end. It's like the universe has to come back into balance or something. Another element, of course, is the fact that people like Kim seem to have no clue as to their privilege. We may not be super-fond of Angelina Jolie, but when we see her using her money and influence to assist people less fortunate than herself, it takes the edge off the green meanies.

And no, it is not just "women hating on women." Ask me about Rush Limbaugh sometime.

Popular posts from this blog

Memoir - The Year of Kent State

by The Urban Blabbermouth
~
I wanted to write a fictional memoir and it got away from me. 

Original
I was born in the Year of Kent State. I didn't know. I was watching a cable channel specializing in historical programs, in this case, newsworthy events from the 1970s. The Ohio National Guard shot 13 unarmed students protesting the Vietnam War on the Kent State University campus. Four students died. By the time I was aware of a bigger world than my own, Kent State passed into history.

Im gonna git u Sukkah

by The Urban Blabbermouth [who may or may not be shown in the photo above... - v-E] ~ True story. I am walking to my car and I notice a couple of Jewish fellows, twenty somethings, with the bouquets of what looks like bamboo or palm. I know they are Jewish for they look Hasidic. They are wearing long black jackets, wide brim black fedora hats, and have curly sideburns. In truth, I classify all Jewish who dress like this as Hasidic although they may identify themselves differently. They are standing near the corner canvassing passersby.

American Lottery

by The Urban Blabbermouth
~
America elected a Black man as President of the Unites States. Twice!  Black people did not do this.  If all the black people voted for Barack Obama, he would only get 13 percent of the vote.  Throw in the Hispanics, the brown ones, not the white ones, and the vote would bloom to 21 percent. Not enough.  So it was the white Americans who elected Barack Obama. 

It is slowly becoming clearer why they would do that instead of electing the other white guy who ran against Barack Obama.  Obama stood for change.  His campaign slogan was "Change we can believe in" and "Yes We Can".  The white people wanted him to change America to bring back their good old days. 

There is a trend here starting with Barack Obama, the election of an improbable candidate, a black man, by white people in a unresolved racially divided America, who spoke of hope, change and an improved America ... to …