Skip to main content

Cain and Abel and Ishmael

                    


By Vol-E (previously posted elsewhere)

Daniel Quinn's groundbreaking book Ishmael offers a fascinating, non-traditional analysis of the Biblical story of Cain and Abel. 

First, the Biblical account: 

In Genesis Chapter 4, Verses 1-12, Eve gives birth to Cain, who grows to be a farmer, and Abel, who tends flocks.  Both brothers bring offerings to God, but only Abel's portions from his flocks are favored, while Cain's offerings of the fruit of the soil are not.  This leads to quick resentment on the part of Cain, who lures his brother to a field and kills him.  God quickly discerns what has happened, though Cain initially lies to cover it ("Am I my brother's keeper?").  God puts Cain under a curse ("Your brother's blood cries out to me from the ground" - v.10 and "When you work the ground, it will no longer yield its crops for you." - v.12).  

The reader may find this startling, since our 21st-century culture tends to look more favorably upon people who farm than on those whose livelihood involves killing animals.  It is easy to become confused and wonder why Cain, the farmer, turned out to more violent than his brother, who by necessity was skilled at slaughter. 

In Ishmael, a teacher and his student ponder the historical developments that have brought the earth to the brink of destruction.  We currently suffer food shortages, land shortages, climate instability and huge gaps between rich and poor, both in terms of nations and individuals. Like many scholarly works, this book seeks to establish a link between a Biblical account and what we experience in the present day. 

Ishmael's repeated theme is that of the Takers and the Leavers.  Leavers represent groups of people who are often referred to as Natives, Aborigines, or "savages."  They exist on a subsistence level, killing animals to survive and respecting the land enough to limit planting and harvesting.  These practices essentially leave the earth the same when people depart as when they arrive -- just as many of us were taught to do when visiting campgrounds, forests, and parks. 

Takers, on the other hand, seek to tame the earth for their own purposes.  "Taking" is a uniquely human practice, since animals do not farm or kill other animals for material gain.  Takers are humans who perceive mankind as the "crown of creation."  They believe that until humans appeared on earth, God's creation was incomplete.  Similarly, they believe that mankind is the end product of creation.  There will be nothing new after us. 

Ishmael proposes that this assumption is merely that; little more than a myth.  And because it is possible that the earth has the potential to give birth in its time to some new configuration of life, humankind is incredibly short-sighted in the way it approaches nature and its resources.  We have become a civilization of takers, rather than leavers, with a very real danger that once we are through with the earth, it will have nothing left to give to anyone, including us. 

And so we return to the story of Cain and Abel.  Abel represents the last vestige of the hunter-gatherer lifestyle.  Cain represents the newer version of humanity -- the one that captures, confines and reins in vast acreages of land for his own use, creating property, driving off or killing animals that threaten crops.  Ishmael postulates that Cain and Abel is actually a symbolic narrative from the time when man began to practice agriculture.  The farmers, advancing mile after mile as the centuries passed, sought to capture the wild lands and adapt them for use by humans.  The hunter-gatherers were slowly driven to extinction -- a pattern matched by the conquest of "savages" by "civilized" humans. 

While the traditional interpretation of Cain and Abel can tell us about the dangers of sibling rivalry, it is fascinating to look at it through a wider lens and reflect on our age-old battle for survival on this planet -- and how the things we do to "tame" the earth may ultimately destroy us all. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Subway Journey Home

by The Urban Blabbermouth. Comments are welcome! ~ There is a ritual to theNew York City subway system. Once there, you lose your humanity.  You are transformed into a savage, brutal and selfish automaton.  Savage in that you push and shove other riders out of your way to get into the subway car.  Brutal in that you never excuse yourself for any atrocities that you commit to get in the subway car.  Selfish in that you never give up your seat to anyone, no matter how crippled or old or pregnant they are.  Automaton in that you never look at any one else as a human being.

Now there are certain strategies that you can employ to be a successful subway rider.  You can stand by the door and obstruct the way just to be selfish and ornery.  That strategy is designed to increase your standing with your fellow passengers by impressing them with how vicious you can be pushing back at people trying to push into the car.  Whenever I see this strategy employed, I immediately piggy back on it.  I move …

Gone Shopping

by The Urban Blabbermouth
~
Dracula escorted his newly created undead aide into the store.

"...and you need to sleep in the daytime," he explained.

"But what are we doing here in Sleepy's Mattress store?" asked his aide. "I thought we slept in coffins."

"We are modern now," replied Dracula. "We use a mattress like anyone else. I tell you, after two hundred years of sleeping on rock and dirt, this is a joy. So much more comfortable and you don't have to haul it around from place to place."

"Amazing," said the aide.

"For a newbie like you, maybe you want to go traditional. Sleepy's has a Posturedic that will fit inside a coffin."

"What do you use?" asked the aide.

"I have a sleep-number bed. I love it. Mrs. Dracula can toss and turn and I don't feel it on my side."

"Now that you mention the ladies, I think I will skip the coffin. A moo…

I Swear!

by Vol-E

I've lived in the south for over 30 years. Having grown up as a New Yorker, there were some changes to get used to once I crossed the Mason-Dixon line.

Language was a big one. My parents were well-behaved in public, but behind the closed doors of our home, they taught me all kinds of interesting vocabulary words, as they took their everyday frustrations out on one another. "Jerk" and "bastard" were two of the earliest ones, but by the time I was about eight, I knew pretty much every one of George Carlin's pet no-nos.

It was only in college that I met people who were outspokenly offended by swear words. The ones that raised eyebrows initially were related to religion. I began to think twice about using "hell" and "damn," and was politely informed one day that "God's last name is not 'dammit.'" So I gradually began censoring myself a bit, which was probably a good thing, once I joined the work force. Macy…